过氧乙酸消毒对太平洋白对虾（南美白对虾）海水养殖循环系统微生物群落的影响。,Journal of Fish Diseases

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › J. Fish Dis. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

过氧乙酸消毒对太平洋白对虾（南美白对虾）海水养殖循环系统微生物群落的影响。
Journal of Fish Diseases ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-02 , DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13207
Felix Teitge ₁ , Christina Peppler ₂ , Dieter Steinhagen ₁ , Verena Jung-Schroers ₁

Affiliation

将热带虾放在循环水产养殖系统（RAS）中时，限制因素之一是维持足够的水质，因此，经常将诸如过氧乙酸（PAA）之类的消毒剂添加到水中，以作为预防或处理措施。在这项研究中，将浓度为0.1 mg / L，1 mg / L和10 mg / L的PAA连续56天施用于凡纳滨对虾的小型海水RAS。用0.1mg / L的处理不会导致细菌总数的减少，因此是无效的。2天后，浓度为10 mg / L已导致化学水参数发生明显变化，因此不建议使用。1 mg / L的浓度导致2天之内氨和亚硝酸盐含量增加，并且水中细菌数量显着增加，这很可能是由于异养细菌的生长增强所致。菌群显示出明显的波动，有迹象表明虾的福利受到影响。因此也不建议使用1 mg PAA / L预防性使用，但在疾病暴发时可以作为短期治疗的替代选择。

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Effect of disinfection with peracetic acid on the microbial community of a seawater aquaculture recirculation system for Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei).

When tropical shrimps are kept in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), one of the limiting factors is the maintenance of a sufficient water quality, and therefore, often disinfectants like peracetic acid (PAA) are added to the water either as prophylactic or treatment measure. In this study, PAA in concentrations of 0.1 mg/L, 1 mg/L and 10 mg/L was applied continuously for 56 days to small‐scale seawater RAS stocked with Litopenaeus vannamei. Treatment with 0.1 mg/L did not result in a reduction in the total bacterial amount and therefore was not effective. A concentration of 10 mg/L led to significant changes in the chemical water parameters already after 2 days and was therefore not recommendable. A concentration of 1 mg/L led to increased levels of ammonia and nitrite within 2 days and to a significant increase in the bacterial amount in the water, most probably due to an enhanced growth of heterotrophic bacteria. The microflora showed significant fluctuations, and there were indications that the welfare of the shrimps was affected. Using 1 mg PAA/L for prophylactic use is therefore also not recommendable but might be an alternative option for short‐term treatment in cases of disease outbreaks.

更新日期：2020-08-28

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊新发论文本刊介绍/投稿指南