中文版惊恐障碍严重程度量表自我报告表在惊恐障碍患者中的信度、效度和临界值[J].,BMC Psychiatry

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › BMC Psychiatry › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

中文版惊恐障碍严重程度量表自我报告表在惊恐障碍患者中的信度、效度和临界值[J].
BMC Psychiatry ( IF 3.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-15 , DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02560-w
Xitong Liu ₁ , Tingting Xu ₁ , Dandan Chen ₁ , Chen Yang ₁ , Pei Wang ₁ , Xiao Huang ₂ , Wenhong Cheng _{1,

3} , Yuan Shen ₄ , Qiang Liu ₁ , Zhen Wang ₁

Affiliation

背景恐慌症（PD）在非精神病临床环境中经常未被诊断、误诊或未经治疗。因此，仍然需要一种具有成本效益、准确且易于管理的 PD 评估工具。出于这个原因，恐慌症严重程度量表（PDSS-SR）的自我报告版本已经被开发出来，并被认为是临床和研究环境中可靠和有用的工具。本研究旨在评估中文版PDSS-SR的信度和效度，并确定PDSS-SR的截止分数。方法采用PDSS-SR、PDSS和汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）对上海市133例PD患者进行评估。而且，117 名非 PD 焦虑患者和 51 名健康受试者也完成了 PDSS-SR，以构建 PD 患者评分的受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线。结果PDSS-SR的内部一致性（Cronbach's α）为0.72～0.80，评价者间相关系数为0.78。主成分分析和方差最大旋转的结果表明，PDSS-SR具有双因素结构，所有七个项目都具有显着载荷。截止分数为 4，与高敏感性（96.03%）和特异性（61.31%）相关。结结果PDSS-SR的内部一致性（Cronbach's α）为0.72～0.80，评价者间相关系数为0.78。主成分分析和方差最大旋转的结果表明，PDSS-SR具有双因素结构，所有七个项目都具有显着载荷。截止分数为 4，与高敏感性（96.03%）和特异性（61.31%）相关。结结果PDSS-SR的内部一致性（Cronbach's α）为0.72～0.80，评价者间相关系数为0.78。主成分分析和方差最大旋转的结果表明，PDSS-SR具有双因素结构，所有七个项目都具有显着载荷。截止分数为 4，与高敏感性（96.03%）和特异性（61.31%）相关。结主成分分析和方差最大旋转的结果表明，PDSS-SR具有双因素结构，所有七个项目都具有显着载荷。截止分数为 4，与高敏感性（96.03%）和特异性（61.31%）相关。结主成分分析和方差最大旋转的结果表明，PDSS-SR具有双因素结构，所有七个项目都具有显着载荷。截止分数为 4，与高敏感性（96.03%）和特异性（61.31%）相关。结

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Reliability, validity and cut-off score of the Chinese version of the panic disorder severity scale self-report form in patients with panic disorder.

BACKGROUND Panic disorder (PD) is often undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, or untreated in non-psychiatric clinical settings. Therefore, a cost-effective, accurate and easy-to-administer instrument for PD assessment is still needed. For that reason, the self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS-SR) has been developed and suggested to be a reliable and useful tool in clinical and research settings. The current study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the PDSS-SR and determine the cut-off score of the PDSS-SR. METHODS A total of 133 patients with PD in Shanghai were assessed by the PDSS-SR, PDSS and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA). Moreover, 117 patients with non-PD anxiety and 51 healthy subjects also completed the PDSS-SR to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the scores of PD patients. RESULTS The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the PDSS-SR was 0.72-0.80, and the interrater correlation coefficient was 0.78. The results of principal component analysis and varimax rotation indicated that the PDSS-SR had a two-factor structure, with all seven items having salient loadings. The cut-off score was 4, which was associated with high sensitivity (96.03%) and specificity (61.31%). CONCLUSIONS The findings demonstrate that these items and the total score of the PDSS-SR have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with PD and that the PDSS-SR can be used by general doctors for clinical screening in China.

更新日期：2020-04-22

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊新发论文本刊介绍/投稿指南