Purpose The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) is a well-accepted method of monitoring training load in athletes in many different sports. It is based on the category-ratio (0-10) RPE scale (BORG-CR10) developed by Borg. There is no evidence how substitution of the Borg 6-20 RPE scale (BORG-RPE) might influence the sRPE in athletes. Method Systematically training, recreational-level athletes from a number of sport disciplines performed 6 randomly ordered, 30-min interval-training sessions, at intensities based on peak power output (PPO) and designed to be easy (50% PPO), moderate (75% PPO), or hard (85% PPO). Ratings of sRPE were obtained 30 min postexercise using either the BORG-CR10 or BORG-RPE and compared for matched exercise conditions. Results The average percentage of heart-rate reserve was well correlated with sRPE from both BORG-CR10 (r = .76) and BORG-RPE (r  = .69). The sRPE ratings from BORG-CR10 and BORG-RPE were very strongly correlated (r = .90) at matched times. Conclusions Although producing different absolute numbers, sRPE derived from either the BORG-CR10 or BORG-RPE provides essentially interchangeable estimates of perceived exercise training intensity.

中文翻译：

---

会话RPE的RPE（感知运动评分）量表的比较。

目的感觉运动的等级评定（sRPE）是一种在许多不同运动项目中监视运动员训练负荷的公认方法。它基于Borg开发的类别比率（0-10）RPE量表（BORG-CR10）。没有证据表明替代Borg 6-20 RPE量表（BORG-RPE）会如何影响运动员的sRPE。方法系统地训练来自多个运动学科的娱乐水平的运动员，进行了6次随机排序的30分钟间隔训练，其强度基于峰值功率输出（PPO），并设计为简单（50％PPO），中等（ 75％PPO）或硬（85％PPO）。运动后30分钟使用BORG-CR10或BORG-RPE获得sRPE的评分，并比较匹配的运动条件。结果BORG-CR10（r = .76）和BORG-RPE（r = .69）的平均心率储备百分比与sRPE高度相关。在匹配的时间，来自BORG-CR10和BORG-RPE的sRPE等级具有非常强的相关性（r = .90）。结论尽管产生不同的绝对数，但从BORG-CR10或BORG-RPE衍生的sRPE提供了可感知的运动训练强度的基本可互换估计。