评估社交恐惧症量表和社交互动焦虑量表，作为对绩效和互动焦虑的评估。,Psychiatry Research

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Psychiatry Res. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

评估社交恐惧症量表和社交互动焦虑量表，作为对绩效和互动焦虑的评估。
Psychiatry Research ( IF 4.2 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-31 , DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.103
Trevor Thompson ₁ , Marta Kaminska ₁ , Christopher Marshall ₂ , Nejra Van Zalk ₃

Affiliation

与社交焦虑症不同，DSM-5对行为焦虑症的分类强调了对特定测量工具的需求。社交恐惧症量表（SPS）和社交互动焦虑量表（SIAS）被广泛用于绩效和一般互动焦虑的评估，但很少有研究使用实际表现和互动压力因子来检验其标准有效性。当前的研究是第一个使用包括心理生理反应性在内的多模态焦虑指数来评估量表的收敛性和判别效度的方法，这是表现焦虑的关键特征。共有93个人完成了SPS和SIAS，并参与了性能和交互方面的挑战。焦虑反应通过自我报告的焦虑，观察者评定的焦虑，心率和皮肤电导。两种量表均与自我报告和观察者评定的焦虑呈中度相关性（r's = 0.21-0.62），与生理指标呈弱相关性（r's = 0.07-0.35），总体上支持收敛标准的有效性。但是，不支持判别标准的有效性，因为SIAS和SPS对两种挑战均显示出与每种标准测度相似的相关性。这些发现表明，SIAS和SPS是评估社交焦虑的有效工具，但可能不适用于绩效和互动焦虑的具体测量。通常支持收敛准则的有效性。但是，不支持判别标准的有效性，因为SIAS和SPS对两种挑战均显示出与每种标准测度相似的相关性。这些发现表明，SIAS和SPS是评估社交焦虑的有效工具，但可能不适用于绩效和互动焦虑的具体测量。通常支持收敛准则的有效性。但是，不支持判别标准的有效性，因为SIAS和SPS对两种挑战均显示出与每种标准测度相似的相关性。这些发现表明，SIAS和SPS是评估社交焦虑的有效工具，但可能不适用于绩效和互动焦虑的具体测量。

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Evaluation of the social phobia scale and social interaction anxiety scale as assessments of performance and interaction anxiety.

The DSM-5 classification of performance anxiety as distinct from social anxiety underlines the need for specific measurement instruments. The Social Phobia Scale (SPS) and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) are widely used assessments of performance and general interaction anxiety, yet few studies have examined their criterion validity using actual performance and interaction stressors. The current study is the first to assess the scales' convergent and discriminant validity using multimodal anxiety indices including psychophysiological reactivity, which is a key characterizing feature of performance anxiety. Ninety-three individuals completed the SPS and SIAS and participated in performance and interaction challenges. Anxiety response was assessed with criterion measures of self-reported anxiety, observer-rated anxiety, heart rate and skin conductance. Both scales were moderately correlated with self-report and observer-rated anxiety (r's = 0.21-0.62) and weakly correlated with physiological measures (r's = 0.07-0.35), generally supporting convergent criterion validity. Discriminant criterion validity was not supported, however, with the SIAS and SPS showing similar correlations with each criterion measure for both social challenges. These findings suggest the SIAS and SPS are valid instruments for the assessment of social anxiety but may not be suitable for the specific measurement of performance and interaction anxiety.

更新日期：2019-11-01

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊新发论文本刊介绍/投稿指南