运动能力测试第二版（BOT-2）：完整和简短形式的兼容性及其对中学生的实用性。,Frontiers in Pediatrics

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Front. Pediatrics › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

运动能力测试第二版（BOT-2）：完整和简短形式的兼容性及其对中学生的实用性。
Frontiers in Pediatrics ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-09 , DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00153
Jan Jírovec ₁ , Martin Musálek ₁ , Filip Mess ₂

Affiliation

背景：运动能力第二版Bruininks-Oseretsky测试（BOT-2）评估了精神运动发育。有两种形式。根据几项研究，BOT-2简表（SF）的结果明显高于BOT-2简表（CF）。这可能是由于在比较SF和CF的结果时使用了不足的分数类型。目的：在考虑年龄和性别的标准评分中，验证BOT-2 SF评估的精神运动发育程度是否可与中学生BOT-2 CF的结果相媲美。方法：本研究样本由8到11岁（9.53±0.85）岁的153名神经型儿童（n = 69个女孩，n = 84个男孩）组成。精神运动发育的程度由BOT-2 CF和BOT-2 SF的标准分数（都考虑性别和年龄）确定。分析了CF与SF之间结果的一致性，BOT-2 SF的敏感性和特异性以及BOT-2 CF和BOT-2 SF中每个子测试结果之间的关系。结果：与BOT-2 CF x = 47.57（±8.29）p <0.05相比，BOT-2 SF提供了统计学上显着更低的标准评分x = 45.87（±5.41）p <0.05，中间效果大小值为Haysω2= 0.09。ROC分析表明，BOT-2 SF可获得足够的敏感性（84％），但特异性较差（42.9％），AUC = 0.484 CI95％（0.31-0.62）。此外，通过CF结果与SF之间的关系只能解释BOT-2 CF总变异的57％。结论：当使用适当的量表来比较两个版本时，与BOT-2 CF相比，BOT-2 SF几乎没有提供明显不同的结果。另外，BOT-SF的特异性较差，表明BOT-2 SF可能是揭示主要是精神运动迟缓但不高于平均水平（心理运动晚期）的儿童的有用工具。此外，由于共享的公共因素的薄弱部分，仍然不清楚BOT-2 CF和BOT-2 SF是否测量相同的行为域。

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition (BOT-2): Compatibility of the Complete and Short Form and Its Usefulness for Middle-Age School Children.

Background: The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition (BOT-2) assesses the psychomotor development. It is available in two forms. According to several studies the BOT-2 short form (SF) provides significantly higher results than the BOT-2 complete form (CF). This might be due to the use of an inadequate type of scores when comparing results of the SF and the CF. Objective: To verify whether the degree of psychomotor development assessed by the BOT-2 SF is comparable to the results of the BOT-2 CF in middle-age school children when using standard scores considering age and sex. Methods: The research sample consisted of n = 153 neurotypical children (n = 69 girls, n = 84 boys) from 8 to 11 years (9.53 ± 0.85). The degree of psychomotor development was determined by the standard scores of the BOT-2 CF and BOT-2 SF-both considering sex and age. The conformity in results between the CF and the SF, the sensitivity and specificity of the BOT-2 SF and the relations between the results of each sub-test within the BOT-2 CF and the BOT-2 SF were analyzed. Results: The BOT-2 SF provided a statistically significantly lower standard score x = 45.87 (±5.41) compared to the BOT-2 CF x = 47.57 (±8.29) p < 0.05 with middle effect size value, Hays ω2 = 0.09. The ROC analysis showed that the BOT-2 SF obtains sufficient sensitivity (84%) but poor specificity (42.9%) and AUC = 0.484 CI95% (0.31-0.62). Moreover, only 57% of total variance of the BOT-2 CF is explained by the relation between the results of the CF and the SF. Conclusion: The BOT-2 SF does not provide practically significant different results compared to the BOT-2 CF when using a proper scale for comparing both versions. In addition, poor specificity of the BOT-SF suggests that the BOT-2 SF might be a useful tool to reveal mainly psychomotorically delayed but not above average (psychomotorically advanced) children. Further, due to the weak portion of a shared common factor, it remains still unclear whether the BOT-2 CF and the BOT-2 SF measure the same behavioral domain.

更新日期：2019-11-01

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊新发论文本刊介绍/投稿指南