<br>健康行为干预措施如何考虑社会背景？文献趋势和共被引分析。,Health (London, England : 1997)

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Health (London) › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

健康行为干预措施如何考虑社会背景？文献趋势和共被引分析。
Health (London, England : 1997) Pub Date : 2017-03-23 , DOI: 10.1177/1363459317695630
Daniel Holman ₁ , Rebecca Lynch ₂ , Aaron Reeves ₃

Affiliation

近年来，健康行为干预作为鼓励人们过上更健康生活的一种手段，在研究和政策方面受到了极大的关注。随着时间的推移，此类干预措施的重点在干预水平（例如个人与社区）和借鉴不同学科观点方面有所不同。最近，许多批评集中在健康行为干预有时会忽视社会背景问题，将健康视为个人选择的问题，并暗示个人责任。这种批评的部分原因是，健康行为干预措施往往没有借鉴对行为和健康的结构和背景方面的替代社会科学理解。然而，据我们所知，还没有研究试图实证评估健康行为干预领域对社会背景的关注程度和方式。在本文中，我们使用文献计量技术来完成这项任务，以规划健康行为干预领域。我们发现，健康行为干预措施的数量近年来迅速增长，特别是自 2006 年左右以来，而对社会科学学科和强调社会背景问题的概念的引用很少，相对而言，2006 年之后该领域的构成较少更多可量化的概念被使用得最多，而那些更接近社会背景复杂性的概念则被提及得最少。文档同被引分析表明，2006 年之前，涉及社会背景的文档在关键引用网络中相对分散，但 2006 年之后，这种影响力已大大减弱。期刊同被引分析显示 2006 年之后学科重叠较少。目前，健康行为干预继续关注行为心理学和行为经济学的个体化方法。我们的研究结果为最近的一些论文提供了实证支持，这些论文表明需要更多的跨学科合作来推动该领域的发展。

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

How do health behaviour interventions take account of social context? A literature trend and co-citation analysis.

In recent years, health behaviour interventions have received a great deal of attention in both research and policy as a means of encouraging people to lead healthier lives. The emphasis of such interventions has varied over time, in terms of level of intervention (e.g. individual vs community) and drawing on different disciplinary perspectives. Recently, a number of critiques have focused on how health behaviour interventions sometimes sideline issues of social context, framing health as a matter of individual choice and, by implication, a personal responsibility. Part of this criticism is that health behaviour interventions often do not draw on alternative social science understandings of the structured and contextual aspects of behaviour and health. Yet to our knowledge, no study has attempted to empirically assess the extent to which, and in what ways, the health behaviour intervention field has paid attention to social context. In this article, we undertake this task using bibliometric techniques in order to map out the health behaviour intervention field. We find that the number of health behaviour interventions has grown rapidly in recent years, especially since around 2006, and that references to social science disciplines and concepts that foreground issues of social context are rare and, relatively speaking, constitute less of the field post 2006. More quantifiable concepts are used most, and those more close to the complexities of social context are mentioned least. The document co-citation analysis suggests that pre 2006, documents referring to social context were relatively diffuse in the network of key citations, but post 2006 this influence had largely diminished. The journal co-citation analysis shows less disciplinary overlap post 2006. At present, health behaviour interventions are continuing to focus on individualised approaches drawn from behavioural psychology and behavioural economics. Our findings lend empirical support to a number of recent papers that suggest more interdisciplinary collaboration is needed to advance the field.

更新日期：2019-11-01

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载