同性男性关系中的上，下和多功能肛门性角色：对关系和性满意度的影响。,Archives of Sexual Behavior

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Arch. Sex. Behav. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

同性男性关系中的上，下和多功能肛门性角色：对关系和性满意度的影响。
Archives of Sexual Behavior ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2018-06-01 , DOI: 10.1007/s10508-018-1240-5
David A Moskowitz ₁ , Christopher P Garcia ₁

Affiliation

在许多男同性恋和双性恋男性关于性姿势自标签的研究中（即称自己为顶，底或多才多艺），存在两个共性：（1）研究倾向于几乎完全集中于具有个人关系的单性恋男性; （2）研究很少考虑关系和关系动态。作为回应，我们探讨了自我标签在男同性恋者和双性恋伴侣中性和关系满意度上的作用。具体而言，我们研究了所采用的性姿势认同与人际关系中已制定的行为是辅音还是不谐音（即匹配或不匹配），以及这如何影响男人对不同关系属性的态度。通过在线调查，我们对169名同性恋关系的男性进行了抽样调查，向他们询问有关其理想的角色角色身份以及与伴侣的现实角色角色的问题。然后，我们要求他们根据10种性和人际关系属性对他们的关系进行评分。多元回归模型表明，理想与现实的穿透性角色失调预示着在关系中达到顶峰的顶极者（在较小程度上）达到顶峰的顶极者之间的性不满。相比之下，穿透性角色失调预示着在关系中达到顶峰的最高层之间的关系满意度，但没有预测到达到顶峰的最低层之间的关系满意度。我们得出结论，在最底层的上层人群中出现这种悖论的潜在原因可能是性利他主义。也就是说，男人可能会对自己关系中的其他方面感到满意，了解伴侣的肛交偏好，

"点击查看英文标题和摘要"

Top, Bottom, and Versatile Anal Sex Roles in Same-Sex Male Relationships: Implications for Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction.

Across much of the gay and bisexual male research on sexual position self-label (i.e., calling oneself a top, bottom, or versatile), there exist two commonalities: (1) studies tend to focus almost entirely on individual, relationally single androphilic men; (2) studies rarely account for relationships and relationship dynamics. In response, we explored the role of self-label over sexual and relationship satisfaction among gay and bisexual partnered men. Specifically, we looked at whether adopted sexual position identities were consonant or dissonant (i.e., matching or mismatching) with enacted behavior in relationships and how that impacted men’s attitudes toward different relational attributes. Through an online survey, we sampled 169 men in same-sex relationships, asking them questions about their ideal penetrative role identities and their reality penetrative roles with their partner. We then asked them to rate their relationship on 10 sexual and interpersonal attributes. Multiple regression modeling suggested ideal-reality penetrative role dissonance was predictive of sexual dissatisfaction among tops who bottomed in their relationships and, to a lesser extent, bottoms who topped. In contrast, penetrative role dissonance was predictive of relationship satisfaction among tops who bottomed in their relationship, but not bottoms who topped. We conclude that a potential reason for this paradox among tops who bottom may be sexual altruism. That is, men may be satisfied with other aspects within their relationships, understand their partner’s anal sex preferences, and accommodate that position in response to their initial relationship satisfaction.

更新日期：2018-06-01

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊新发论文