In recent years there have been many disparate uses of the terms sustainability and resilience, with some framing sustainability and resilience as the same concept, and others claiming them to be entirely different and unrelated. To investigate similarities, differences, and current management frameworks for increasing sustainability and resilience, a literature review was undertaken that focused on integrated use of sustainability and resilience in an environmental management context. Sustainability was defined through the triple bottom line of environmental, social and economic system considerations. Resilience was viewed as the ability of a system to prepare for threats, absorb impacts, recover and adapt following persistent stress or a disruptive event. Three generalized management frameworks for organizing sustainability and resilience were found to dominate the literature: (1) resilience as a component of sustainability, (2) sustainability as a component of resilience, and (3) resilience and sustainability as separate objectives. Implementations of these frameworks were found to have common goals of providing benefits to people and the environment under normal and extreme operating conditions, with the best examples building on similarities and minimizing conflicts between resilience and sustainability.

中文翻译：

---

弹性和可持续性：环境管理应用中的异同。

近年来，可持续性和弹性这两个术语有许多不同的用法，其中一些框架将可持续性和弹性作为同一个概念，而另一些人则声称它们是完全不同且无关的。为了研究相似性，差异和当前用于提高可持续性和弹性的管理框架，进行了一篇文献综述，重点是在环境管理环境中对可持续性和弹性的综合利用。可持续性是通过考虑环境，社会和经济系统的三重底线来定义的。抵御能力被认为是系统针对持续的压力或破坏性事件做好准备以应对威胁，吸收影响，恢复和适应的能力。发现用于组织可持续性和弹性的三个通用管理框架主导了文献：（1）弹性是可持续性的组成部分；（2）可持续性是弹性的组成部分；（3）弹性和可持续性是单独的目标。人们发现，这些框架的实施具有共同的目标，即在正常和极端的运行条件下为人类和环境带来利益，最好的例子是建立在相似性上并最大程度地减少弹性和可持续性之间的冲突。