Aims & Scope and Article Types

The journal offers a platform for reporting studies of innovations and socio-economic transitions to enhance an environmentally sustainable economy and thus solve structural resource scarcity and environmental problems, notably related to fossil energy use and climate change. This involves attention for technological, organizational, economic, institutional and political innovations as well as economy-wide and sector changes, such as in the areas of energy, transport, agriculture and water management. The journal aims to tackle the most difficult questions, dealing with social, economic, behavioral-psychological and political barriers and opportunities as well as their complex interaction. The journal is multidisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, and invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines within the social, environmental and innovation sciences.

Specific research areas covered include:
Theoretical analysis, formal modeling, empirical studies, policy discussion and a critical survey of relevant literature. Practical cases may address transitions in specific sectors, cities or regions. Articles on historical transitions not specifically related to environment and sustainability are welcome if they include a section with unique lessons for sustainability transitions. A non-exhaustive list of keywords and themes is as follows: behavior in line with bounded rationality, development theories, diffusion of innovations, environmental regulation, formal modeling, geography of innovations, historical transitions, increasing returns to scale and path dependence, innovation policy, institutional barriers, international cooperation and coordination, learning-by-doing, learning curves, lock-in, new governance, niche markets, optimal technological diversity, regime analysis, social and political power, strategic niche management, rebound effect, recombinant innovation, sector structure, social learning, transition experiments, technological regimes, transition pathways/mechanisms, vested interests, visions of the future.

Article types in EIST
All submissions to Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, and fit to the journal's aims and scope. Several categories of articles are welcome.

Research articles (max. 8000 words, excluding references and figure/table captions)
Research articles devoted to theoretical, modeling, experimental, historical and empirical-quantitative analysis of important questions in the field. The journal also accepts qualitative case study research (historical, institutional, geographical, organizational, etc.). Furthermore, it is open to studies opposing different views and explaining fundamental differences in long-standing debates (such as on growth, the role of price instruments and the role of voluntary action). Evaluated by two or three outside reviewers.

Reviews (max. 10,000 words excluding references)
The journal occasionally publishes articles that review, critically examine and interpret important general subject areas within the wider scope of the journal. These articles need to use systematic and good quality methodology and data sources, and result in insightful synthesis. They are based on reviews of previous scientific research, not of other types of data (e.g. policy documents). Evaluated by two or three outside reviewers.

Perspectives (generally 2000 to 4000 words excluding references)
provide an opportunity for authors to present a novel or distinctive viewpoint on any subject within the journal's scope, with a strong focus on current advances and future directions in transition studies, including policy recommendations. They may be opinionated but should remain balanced and are intended to stimulate discussion and new approaches. Perspectives may also advocate a controversial position, present a speculative hypothesis, introduce or critique new concepts in the field of transition studies, or mark something significant in current affairs. Perspectives are reviewed by the editorial team and one external commentator.

Policy briefings (generally 1500-2000 words excluding references)
serve the purpose of building connections between the sustainability transitions research community and the policy and practice of sustainability transitions. A policy brief serves to develop elaborate policy or practice recommendations based on conducted academic research and/or to provide reflections on recent developments in the policy and practice of sustainability transitions. Policy briefings will have a substantial engagement with real-world practice of sustainability transitions, are not expected to discuss methodologies, are embedded in academic debate, and are generally written as a personal commentary. Policy briefings are reviewed by at least two editors.

Special issues (SI)
The journal is open to SIs addressing themes congruent with the topical focus of the journal. They need to identify an important gap in the current transition related literature, which requires a variety of complementary perspectives to be addressed. SIs consist of coherent and high-quality collections of scholarly contributions. Please send a proposal to the editor-in-chief including the following items: title, guest editors (names, positions, affiliations and short bio), a short summary (research gap, contribution intended by the SI, a list of relevant research questions, which shall be covered by the different papers in the SI, approaches and innovative character) and a list of potential contributions (with authors, affiliations, titles and short abstract). In general, we are reluctant to publish SIs that remain restricted to results of specific research programs and we expect the guest editors to include an open call for contributions.

Research paper
Survey
Comments and views
Policy brief 
Book Review 
Special issues

Editor-in-Chief
J.C.J.M. van den Bergh
ICREA, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; School of Business and Economics & Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands Email J.C.J.M. van den Bergh
Associate Editors
M. J. Cohen
New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, 07102-1982, United StatesEmail M. J. Cohen
P. Kivimaa, PhD
Finnish Environment Institute Climate Change Programme, Helsinki, Finland Email P. Kivimaa, PhD
H. Rohracher
Linkoping University Technology and Social Change Theme, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden Email H. Rohracher
B. Truffer
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology (EAWAG), Dübendorf, Switzerland; Copernicus Institute and Economic Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands Email B. Truffer
Book Review Editor
J. Köhler
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany Email J. Köhler
Editorial Board
N.W. Adger
University of Exeter College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Exeter, United Kingdom
N.A. Ashford
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
R. Ayres
European Institution for Administration and Affairs, Fontainebleau, France
F. Berkhout
King's College London Department of Geography, London, United Kingdom
R. Brown
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
R. Costanza
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
F. Fischer
Rutgers University Newark, Newark, New Jersey, United States
M. Fischer-Kowalski
Alpen-Adria University, Klagenfurt, Austria
C. Folke
Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
T. Foxon
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
K. Frenken
Utrecht University Department of Innovation Environmental and Energy Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands
F. Geels
The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
J.M. Gowdy
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, United States
S. Guy
The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
R.B. Howarth
Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States
A.B. Jaffe
Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
G. Kallis
Autonomous University of Barcelona Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Bellaterra, Spain
R. Kemp
United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, Netherlands
Y. Lu
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
J. Mokyr
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States
N. Nakicenovic
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
R.B. Norgaard
University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
C. Perez
London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
D. Popp
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States
J. Rotmans
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
M. Ruth
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
J. Schot
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
L. Srivastava
TERI University, New Delhi, India
F. Steward
University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom
A. Stirling
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
R. Van der Ploeg
University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
B. Walker
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia
U. Witt
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany
M. Yarime
The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, Chiba, Japan