We report findings of this replication study, examining the internalizing subscale (SRSS-I4) of the revised version of the Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing behavior (SRSS-IE 9) and the internalizing subscale of the Teacher Report Form (TRF). Using the sample from 13 elementary schools across three states with 195 K–5 students, we replicated the initial data analytic plan used to determine initial cutting scores. Results from logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curves suggested the following preliminary SRSS-I4 risk categories: 0–1 low, 2 moderate, and 3–12 high risk for internalizing behavior patterns relative to the TRF internalizing subscale score. Results yielded adequate levels of sensitivity and specificity for the first cut, and questionable sensitivity for the upper cut. We planned to conduct subsequent analysis to address the nested nature of the data. Yet, most teachers completed the TRF for one student making this not possible. We discuss limitations and directions for future research, calling for replication with larger samples to facilitate nesting given schoolwide screening practices involve teachers screening multiple students. We also encourage consideration of two risk categories: 0–1 for low and 2+ for a risk category, not distinguishing between moderate- and high-risk categories.

中文翻译：

---

A 再分析：SRSS-IE 内化分数线以支持小学的数据知情决策工作


我们报告了这项复制研究的结果，检查了修订版学生内化和外化行为风险筛查量表 （SRSS-IE 4） 的内化分量表 （SRSS-I9） 和教师报告表 （TRF） 的内化分量表。使用来自三个州的 13 所小学和 195 名 K-5 学生的样本，我们复制了用于确定初始分数的初始数据分析计划。logistic 回归和接受者操作员特征曲线的结果表明以下初步 SRSS-I4 风险类别：相对于 TRF 内化子量表评分，内化行为模式的风险为 0-1 低、2 中和 3-12 高风险。结果对第一次切割产生了足够的敏感性和特异性水平，而对上切的敏感性则值得怀疑。我们计划进行后续分析以解决数据的嵌套性质。然而，大多数老师为一名学生完成了 TRF，这使得这是不可能的。我们讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向，呼吁用更大的样本进行复制，以促进嵌套，因为全校范围的筛查做法涉及教师筛查多个学生。我们还鼓励考虑两个风险类别： 0-1 表示低风险类别，风险类别为 2+，不区分中高风险类别。