Extract

We thank our esteemed colleague R. Naeije for his interest in our meta-analysis [1], and agree that the discussion around the correct upper limit of normal (ULN) for the pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) is not new. We also agree that even a PAWP difference of a single mmHg matters in clinical practice, as it can have direct and profound implications for clinical decision-making, emphasising the importance of this discussion.

中文翻译：

---

回复：肺动脉楔压的正常极限

 提取

我们感谢我们尊敬的同事 R. Naeije 对我们的荟萃分析 [1] 的关注，并同意围绕肺动脉楔压 （PAWP） 的正确正常上限 （ULN） 的讨论并不新鲜。我们还同意，即使是单个 mmHg 的 PAWP 差异在临床实践中也很重要，因为它可能对临床决策产生直接而深远的影响，强调了这一讨论的重要性。