AimsTo systematically review the current application status of ChatGPT in nursing and explore its application effects.DesignAn integrative review.MethodsFollowing inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers summarised the selected literature and conducted a quality appraisal, followed by narrative synthesis.Data SourcesPubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from January 2022 to June 2024.ResultsA total of 31 papers met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen empirical studies were rated as grade 5, while five were rated as grade 4. The references of a minireview were not recently published and lacked ChatGPT‐related articles, and a systematic review was of low quality. The review focused on three main topics: (1) The subsidiary role of ChatGPT in nursing; (2) Comparison of different models' effectiveness and (3) Existing challenges.ConclusionsWhile adopting new technologies such as ChatGPT, it is important to maintain a balanced perspective on both its benefits and limitations. Nursing professionals must actively address these deficiencies and explore solutions to improve ChatGPT's utility in the field.Implications to the Profession and Patient CareThis review synthesised evidence on ChatGPT's application and highlighted existing challenges in nursing. Nursing researchers, educators and practitioners can further validate these findings to explore its potential in various aspects of nursing practice.ImpactFor researchers, ChatGPT can enhance language quality and summarise findings effectively, but adherence to research standards is crucial. For educators, ChatGPT can serve as an effective information source for students, though caution should be taken to avoid overreliance. For practitioners, ChatGPT can offer useful suggestions for clinical practice, but these should be critically evaluated and not followed blindly, as issues of inaccuracy must be addressed.Reporting MethodThis review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

中文翻译：

---

探索 ChatGPT 在护理领域的当前应用和有效性：综合综述


AimsTo 系统梳理了 ChatGPT 在护理领域的应用现状，并探讨其应用效果。设计综合评价。方法按照纳入和排除标准，两名研究人员总结选定的文献并进行质量评价，然后进行叙述性综合。数据来源检索时间：2022 年 1 月至 2024 年 6 月的 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus，结果共有 31 篇论文符合纳入标准。15 项实证研究被评为 5 级，而 5 项被评为 4 级。小型综述的参考文献不是最近发表的，也缺乏与 ChatGPT 相关的文章，系统综述的质量很低。综述侧重于三个主要主题：（1） ChatGPT 在护理中的辅助作用;（2） 不同模型有效性的比较和 （3） 存在的挑战。结论在采用 ChatGPT 等新技术时，重要的是要对其优点和局限性保持平衡的看法。护理专业人员必须积极解决这些缺陷并探索解决方案以提高 ChatGPT 在该领域的实用性。对专业和患者护理的影响本综述综合了 ChatGPT 应用的证据，并强调了护理方面的现有挑战。护理研究人员、教育工作者和从业者可以进一步验证这些发现，以探索其在护理实践各个方面的潜力。影响对于研究人员来说，ChatGPT 可以提高语言质量并有效地总结研究结果，但遵守研究标准至关重要。对于教育工作者来说，ChatGPT 可以作为学生的有效信息来源，但应谨慎避免过度依赖。 对于从业者来说，ChatGPT 可以为临床实践提供有用的建议，但这些应该进行批判性评估，而不是盲目遵循，因为必须解决不准确的问题。报告方法本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。患者或公众贡献无患者或公众贡献。