Sharpe (2024) summarized the factors leading to editorial bias, lack of diversity, and lack of transparency and indicated what might improve matters. Here, I argue that the suggestions that were made would be improved if more thought were given to how these changes impact the incentives of editors. I give examples in the areas of control of bias, encouragement of diversity, and increase of transparency, showing what might be done to incentivize editors, along with other stakeholders, to work on these issues. Perhaps most notably, I suggest that we might change the publication model to allow more individuals to take part by retaining peer review but not organizing the reviews around journals that each have a single chief editor. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

为了减少编辑的偏见并提高多样性和透明度，编辑必须有动力：对夏普的评论 （2024）。


Sharpe （2024） 总结了导致编辑偏见、缺乏多样性和缺乏透明度的因素，并指出了哪些因素可能会改善问题。在这里，我认为，如果更多地考虑这些变化如何影响编辑者的激励，那么所提出的建议将会得到改进。我举了控制偏见、鼓励多样性和提高透明度方面的例子，展示了可以做些什么来激励编辑者和其他利益相关者一起努力解决这些问题。也许最值得注意的是，我建议我们可以改变出版模式，让更多的人参与进来，保留同行评审，但不围绕每个期刊都有一个主编来组织评审。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 （c） 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。