当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Urol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Is Confirmatory Biopsy Still Necessary for Active Surveillance of Men With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric MRI?
The Journal of Urology ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-10-02 , DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004268
Yasin Bhanji,Mufaddal K Mamawala,Sean A Fletcher,Patricia Landis,Hiten D Patel,Katarzyna J Macura,Christian P Pavlovich

PURPOSE Men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) considering active surveillance (AS) are recommended confirmatory biopsy (CBx). Whether this is necessary in the era of MRI-informed biopsies is questionable. MATERIALS AND METHODS We studied men with grade group (GG) 1 PCa at diagnostic biopsy (DBx) considering AS who underwent MRI and CBx (systematic + targeted) within 18 months. Outcomes were grade reclassification to GG ≥ 2 and GG ≥ 3 and reclassification to unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) disease. Subset analyses were performed for men with (1) MRI before DBx and (2) MRI after DBx. RESULTS Five hundred twenty-two men had GG1 PCa at DBx. At CBx, 20% reclassified to GG ≥ 2, 12% to UIR disease, and 5.6% to GG ≥ 3. Of the 306 with positive MRI (PI-RADS > 3), 27% reclassified to GG ≥ 2 and 16% to UIR disease; men with negative MRI experienced these outcomes at rates of 9.2% and 5.5%, respectively. There were no differences in reclassification outcomes based on MRI timing (group A vs B), and neither PSA density nor prostate volume added to MRI information. In men with MRI targets, approximately one-third of GG > 2 reclassification events were only captured by systematic biopsy core(s). CONCLUSIONS Reclassification rates at CBx were high in men with positive MRI, but < 10% for all reclassification outcomes in men with negative MRI (95% CI, 5.8%-14% for GG > 2; 95% CI, 2.9%-10% for UIR; 95% CI, 0.8%-5.3% for GG > 3). Our data support systematic + targeted CBx for men with positive MRI considering AS, whereas men with GG1 cancer and negative MRI should be able to defer CBx.

中文翻译:


在多参数 MRI 时代,对 1 级前列腺癌男性患者进行主动监测是否仍然需要确认性活检?



目的 被诊断患有前列腺癌 (PCa) 的男性考虑主动监测 (AS) 推荐进行确认性活检 (CBx)。在 MRI 知情活检时代,这是否必要是值得怀疑的。材料和方法 我们研究了在诊断性活检 (DBx) 中具有等级组 (GG) 1 PCa 的男性,考虑到 AS 在 18 个月内接受了 MRI 和 CBx(系统性 + 靶向)。结局是分级再分类为 GG ≥ 2 和 GG ≥ 3,再分类为不良中危 (UIR) 疾病。对 (1) DBx 前 MRI 和 (2) DBx 后 MRI 的男性进行亚组分析。结果 522 名男性在 DBx 时有 GG1 PCa。在 CBx 中,20% 被重新分类为 GG ≥ 2,12% 被重新分类为 UIR 疾病,5.6% 被重新分类为 GG ≥ 3。在 306 例 MRI 阳性 (PI-RADS > 3) 中,27% 重新分类为 GG ≥ 2,16% 重新分类为 UIR 疾病;MRI 阴性的男性经历这些结果的比率分别为 9.2% 和 5.5%。基于 MRI 时间的重新分类结果没有差异 (A 组与 B 组),并且 PSA 密度和前列腺体积均未添加到 MRI 信息中。在具有 MRI 靶标的男性中,大约 1/3 的 GG > 2 重分类事件仅由系统活检核心捕获。结论 MRI 阳性男性 CBx 重分类率高,但 MRI 阴性男性所有重分类结果的 < 10% (95% CI,GG > 5.8%-14%;95% CI,UIR 2.9%-10%;95% CI,GG > 0.8%-5.3%)。我们的数据支持考虑 AS 的 MRI 阳性男性的系统 + 靶向 CBx,而 GG1 癌症和 MRI 阴性的男性应该能够推迟 CBx。
更新日期:2024-10-02
down
wechat
bug