Claims of AI outperforming medical practitioners are under scrutiny, as the evidence supporting many of these claims is not convincing or transparently reported. These claims often lack specificity, contextualization, and empirical grounding. In this comment, we offer constructive ethical guidance that can benefit authors, journal editors, and peer reviewers when reporting and evaluating findings in studies comparing AI to physician performance. The guidance provided here forms an essential addition to current reporting guidelines for healthcare studies using machine learning.

中文翻译：

---

报告和评估人工智能优于人类医生的说法的道德指南


人工智能优于医生的说法正在受到审查，因为支持这些说法的证据并不令人信服或不透明。这些主张往往缺乏具体性、情境化和经验基础。在这篇评论中，我们提供了建设性的道德指导，可以使作者、期刊编辑和同行评审员在报告和评估人工智能与医生表现比较的研究结果时受益。此处提供的指南是对当前使用机器学习的医疗保健研究报告指南的重要补充。