Ontological monists hold that there is only one way of being, while ontological pluralists hold that there are many; for example, concrete objects like tables and chairs exist in a different way from abstract objects like numbers and sets. Correspondingly, the monist will want the familiar existential quantifier as a primitive logical constant, whereas the pluralist will want distinct ones, such as for abstract and concrete existence. In this paper, we consider how the debate between the monist and pluralist relates to the standard test for logicality. We deploy this test and show that it favors the monist.

中文翻译：

---

存在方式和逻辑性

本体论一元论者认为只有一种存在方式，而本体论多元论者则认为存在方式有多种；例如，桌子和椅子等具体对象与数字和集合等抽象对象的存在方式不同。相应地，一元论者想要熟悉的存在量词作为原始逻辑常数，而多元论者想要不同的量词，例如抽象和具体存在。在本文中，我们考虑了一元论者和多元论者之间的争论如何与逻辑性标准测试相关联。我们部署此测试并表明它有利于一元论者。