精神分裂症NMDA-R功能减退模型始于对接触PCP或氯胺酮的精神分裂症患者精神病症状沉淀的临床观察。接触急性低剂量氯胺酮的健康志愿者会出现轻度精神病,但也会出现消极和认知型症状,让人想起精神分裂症的完整临床表现。在啮齿类动物中,急性全身性氯胺酮导致细胞外额叶谷氨酸和多巴胺的反常增加。在使用1 H-MRS 的健康志愿者中,急性氯胺酮也导致前额叶谷氨酸的类似增加。此外,亚慢性低剂量五氯苯酚会导致啮齿动物额叶树突树密度减少。在精神分裂症的死后超微结构研究中,树突复杂性和锥体细胞体体积的广泛减少已被反复描述。这很可能解释了体内 MRI 描述的广泛的、微妙的进行性皮质变薄。此外,在死后组织中多次发现前额叶 NMDA-R 必需的 GluN 1亚基减少。关于精神分裂症的大量1 H-MRS 文献记录了在疾病早期、抗精神病治疗之前,纹状体中谷氨酸浓度出现类似特征的小幅增加(与 PET 报道的突触前多巴胺释放增加的结构相同)。最近的遗传学文献可靠地检测到涉及几种谷氨酸相关基因的常见变异的风险影响非常小。 药理学文献遵循两个主要轨迹,直接由 NMDA-R 低模型提供信息:甘氨酸位点的激动作用(主要是针对阴性和认知症状的附加研究);和谷氨酸能释放的突触前调节(作为急性精神病的单一药物)。不幸的是,到目前为止,这两种方法都失败了。毫无疑问,精神分裂症中存在大脑谷氨酸异常,其中一些异常与疾病的病因有关。遗传学文献直接支持谷氨酸能功能障碍的非特异性病因学作用。 NMDA-R 功能减退是否作为一种特定机制解释了该疾病的任何重要组成部分仍不清楚。然而,谷氨酸能模型仍然具有指导精神分裂症未来研究的启发价值。在疾病早期联合检查体内大脑谷氨酸能、GABA 能和多巴胺能系统的新工具可能为超越多巴胺 D2 阻断的下一代临床试验奠定基础。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Glutamatergic dysfunction in Schizophrenia
The NMDA-R hypofunction model of schizophrenia started with the clinical observation of the precipitation of psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia exposed to PCP or ketamine. Healthy volunteers exposed to acute low doses of ketamine experienced mild psychosis but also negative and cognitive type symptoms reminiscent of the full clinical picture of schizophrenia. In rodents, acute systemic ketamine resulted in a paradoxical increase in extracellular frontal glutamate as well as of dopamine. Similar increase in prefrontal glutamate was documented with acute ketamine in healthy volunteers with 1H-MRS. Furthermore, sub-chronic low dose PCP lead to reductions in frontal dendritic tree density in rodents. In post-mortem ultrastructural studies in schizophrenia, a broad reduction in dendritic complexity and somal volume of pyramidal cells has been repeatedly described. This most likely accounts for the broad, subtle progressive cortical thinning described with MRI in- vivo. Additionally, prefrontal reductions in the obligatory GluN1 subunit of the NMDA-R has been repeatedly found in post-mortem tissue. The vast 1H-MRS literature in schizophrenia has documented trait-like small increases in glutamate concentrations in striatum very early in the illness, before antipsychotic treatment (the same structure where increased pre-synaptic release of dopamine has been reported with PET). The more recent genetic literature has reliably detected very small risk effects for common variants involving several glutamate-related genes. The pharmacological literature has followed two main tracks, directly informed by the NMDA-R hypo model: agonism at the glycine site (as mostly add-on studies targeting negative and cognitive symptoms); and pre-synaptic modulation of glutamatergic release (as single agents for acute psychosis). Unfortunately, both approaches have failed so far. There is little doubt that brain glutamatergic abnormalities are present in schizophrenia and that some of these are related to the etiology of the illness. The genetic literature directly supports a non- specific etiological role for glutamatergic dysfunction. Whether NMDA-R hypofunction as a specific mechanism accounts for any important component of the illness is still not evident. However, a glutamatergic model still has heuristic value to guide future research in schizophrenia. New tools to jointly examine brain glutamatergic, GABA-ergic and dopaminergic systems in-vivo, early in the illness, may lay the ground for a next generation of clinical trials that go beyond dopamine D2 blockade.