Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
In recent years, advanced machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques have gained popularity due to their ability to solve problems across various domains with high performance and quality. However, these techniques are often so complex that they fail to provide simple and understandable explanations for the outputs they generate. To address this issue, the field of explainable artificial intelligence has recently emerged. On the other hand, most data generated in different domains are inherently structural; that is, they consist of parts and relationships among them. Such data can be represented using either a simple data-structure or form, such as a vector, or a complex data-structure, such as a graph. The effect of this representation form on the explainability and interpretability of machine learning models is not extensively discussed in the literature. In this survey paper, we review efficient algorithms proposed for learning from inherently structured data, emphasizing how their representation form affects the explainability of learning models. A conclusion of our literature review is that using complex forms or data-structures for data representation improves not only the learning performance, but also the explainability and transparency of the model.
- Frank Emmert-Streib, Olli Yli-Harja, and Matthias Dehmer. 2020. Explainable artificial intelligence and machine learning: A reality rooted perspective. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 10, 6 (2020), e1368. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/widm.1368 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/widm.1368Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Arun Rai. 2019. Explainable AI: from black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 48 (12 2019). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreas Holzinger, Georg Langs, Helmut Denk, Kurt Zatloukal, and Heimo Muller. 2019. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 9, 4 (2019). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/widm.1312Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ashley Deeks. 2019. THE JUDICIAL DEMAND FOR EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Columbia Law Review 119, 7 (2019), 1829–1850. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26810851Google Scholar
- Alejandro Barredo Arrieta, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Adrien Bennetot, Siham Tabik, Alberto Barbado, Salvador Garcia, Sergio Gil-Lopez, Daniel Molina, Richard Benjamins, Raja Chatila, and Francisco Herrera. 2020. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion 58(2020), 82 – 115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Shurui Gui, and Shuiwang Ji. 2020. Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Survey. CoRR abs/2012.15445(2020). arXiv:2012.15445 https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15445Google Scholar
- Ch.V Raghavendran and Ganti Naga Satish. February 21, 2019. Data Structures through C++ – A quick reference. Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
- Tim Bray, Jean Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Eve Maler, and Francois Yergeau. November 2008. eXtensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition). https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/. (November 2008).Google Scholar
- Riccardo Guidotti, Anna Monreale, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. 2018. A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models. Comput. Surveys 51, 5 (2018), 1–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3236009Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lukas-Valentin Herm, Kai Heinrich, Jonas Wanner, and Christian Janiesch. 2022. Stop ordering machine learning algorithms by their explainability! A user-centered investigation of performance and explainability. International Journal of Information Management (2022), 102538. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102538Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pantelis Linardatos, Vasilis Papastefanopoulos, and Sotiris Kotsiantis. 2021. Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods. Entropy 23, 1 (2021). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23010018Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Sahakyan, Zeyar Aung, and Talal Rahwan. 2021. Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Tabular Data: A Survey. IEEE Access 9(2021), 135392–135422. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3116481Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohammed Javeed Zaki and Charu C. Aggarwal. 2003. XRules: an effective structural classifier for XML data. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA, August 24 - 27, 2003, Lise Getoor, Ted E. Senator, Pedro M. Domingos, and Christos Faloutsos (Eds.). ACM, 316–325. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/956750.956787Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siegfried Nijssen and Joost N. Kok. 2004. A quickstart in frequent structure mining can make a difference. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Seattle, Washington, USA, August 22-25, 2004, Won Kim, Ron Kohavi, Johannes Gehrke, and William DuMouchel (Eds.). ACM, 647–652. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1014052.1014134Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani, Morteza Haghir Chehreghani, Caro Lucas, and Masoud Rahgozar. 2011. OInduced: An Efficient Algorithm for Mining Induced Patterns From Rooted Ordered Trees. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A 41, 5 (2011), 1013–1025. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2096808Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani. 2011. Efficiently Mining Unordered Trees. In 11th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 11-14, 2011, Diane J. Cook, Jian Pei, Wei Wang, Osmar R. Zaïane, and Xindong Wu (Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, 111–120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2011.62Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammed Javeed Zaki. 2005. Efficiently Mining Frequent Trees in a Forest: Algorithms and Applications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 8 (2005), 1021–1035. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2005.125Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammed Javeed Zaki. 2005. Efficiently Mining Frequent Embedded Unordered Trees. Fundam. Informaticae 66, 1-2 (2005), 33–52. http://content.iospress.com/articles/fundamenta-informaticae/fi66-1-2-03Google Scholar
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani and Maurice Bruynooghe. 2016. Mining rooted ordered trees under subtree homeomorphism. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 30, 5 (2016), 1249–1272. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10618-015-0439-5Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani and Morteza Haghir Chehreghani. 2016. Transactional Tree Mining. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - European Conference, ECML PKDD 2016, Riva del Garda, Italy, September 19-23, 2016, Proceedings, Part I (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Paolo Frasconi, Niels Landwehr, Giuseppe Manco, and Jilles Vreeken (Eds.), Vol. 9851. Springer, 182–198. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46128-1_12Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani, Morteza Haghir Chehreghani, Caro Lucas, Masoud Rahgozar, and Euhanna Ghadimi. 2009. Efficient rule based structural algorithms for classification of tree structured data. Intell. Data Anal. 13, 1 (2009), 165–188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/IDA-2009-0361Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diane Cook and Lawrence Holder. 2000. Graph-Based Data Mining. Intelligent Systems and their Applications, IEEE 15 (04 2000), 32 – 41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/5254.850825Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dheeru Dua and Casey Graff. 2017. UCI Machine Learning Repository. (2017). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/mlGoogle Scholar
- J. Ross Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jesus Gonzalez, Lawrence Holder, and Diane Cook. 2001. Application of Graph-Based Concept Learning to the Predictive Toxicology Domain. In PTC, Workshop atthe 5th PKDD.Google Scholar
- Mukund Deshpande, Michihiro Kuramochi, Nikil Wale, and George Karypis. 2005. Frequent Substructure-Based Approaches for Classifying Chemical Compounds. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 8 (2005), 1036–1050. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2005.127Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hong Cheng, Xifeng Yan, and Jiawei Han. 2010. Discriminative Frequent Pattern-Based Graph Classification. Springer New York, New York, NY, 237–262. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6515-8_9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deepak Bandyopadhyay, Jun Huan, Jinze Liu, Jan Prins, Jack Snoeyink, Wei Wang, and Alexander Tropsha. 2006. Structure-based function inference using protein family-specific fingerprints. Protein Science 15, 6 (2006), 1537–1543. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.062189906 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1110/ps.062189906Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexey G Murzin, Steven E Brenner, Tim Hubbard, and Cyrus Chothia. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. Journal of molecular biology 247, 4 (1995), 536–540.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julian R. Ullmann. 1976. An Algorithm for Subgraph Isomorphism. J. ACM 23, 1 (1976), 31–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/321921.321925Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chuntao Jiang, Frans Coenen, and Michele Zito. 2010. Frequent Sub-graph Mining on Edge Weighted Graphs. In Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, 12th International Conference, DAWAK 2010, Bilbao, Spain, August/September 2010. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Torben Bach Pedersen, Mukesh K. Mohania, and A Min Tjoa (Eds.), Vol. 6263. Springer, 77–88. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15105-7_7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bahadir Özdemir and Selim Aksoy. 2010. Image Classification Using Subgraph Histogram Representation. In 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2010, Istanbul, Turkey, 23-26 August 2010. IEEE Computer Society, 1112–1115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2010.278Google ScholarDigital Library
- Franz Aurenhammer. 1991. Voronoi Diagrams—a Survey of a Fundamental Geometric Data Structure. ACM Comput. Surv. 23, 3 (sep 1991), 345–405. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/116873.116880Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fei-Fei Li and Pietro Perona. 2005. A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Learning Natural Scene Categories. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005), 20-26 June 2005, San Diego, CA, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 524–531. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2005.16Google ScholarDigital Library
- Niusvel Acosta-Mendoza, Andrés Gago Alonso, and José Eladio Medina-Pagola. 2012. Frequent approximate subgraphs as features for graph-based image classification. Knowl. Based Syst. 27(2012), 381–392. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.12.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sebastian Nowozin, Koji Tsuda, Takeaki Uno, Taku Kudo, and Gökhan H. Bakir. 2007. Weighted Substructure Mining for Image Analysis. In 2007 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2007), 18-23 June 2007, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. IEEE Computer Society. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2007.383171Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akihiro Inokuchi, Takashi Washio, and Hiroshi Motoda. 2003. Complete Mining of Frequent Patterns from Graphs: Mining Graph Data. Mach. Learn. 50, 3 (2003), 321–354. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021726221443Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xifeng Yan and Jiawei Han. 2002. gSpan: Graph-Based Substructure Pattern Mining. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2002), 9-12 December 2002, Maebashi City, Japan. IEEE Computer Society, 721–724. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2002.1184038Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohammad Al Hasan and Mohammed J. Zaki. 2009. Output Space Sampling for Graph Patterns. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2, 1 (2009), 730–741. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14778/1687627.1687710Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chuntao Jiang, Frans Coenen, and Michele Zito. 2013. A survey of frequent subgraph mining algorithms. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 28, 1 (2013), 75–105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888912000331Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akihiro Inokuchi, Takashi Washio, and Hiroshi Motoda. 2000. An Apriori-Based Algorithm for Mining Frequent Substructures from Graph Data. In Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 4th European Conference, PKDD 2000, Lyon, France, September 13-16, 2000, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Djamel A. Zighed, Henryk Jan Komorowski, and Jan M. Zytkow (Eds.), Vol. 1910. Springer, 13–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45372-5_2Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. K. Hastings. 1970. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications. Biometrika 57, 1 (1970), 97–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2334940Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani, Talel Abdessalem, Albert Bifet, and Meriem Bouzbila. 2020. Sampling informative patterns from large single networks. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 106 (2020), 653–658. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.01.042Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mathias Niepert, Mohamed Ahmed, and Konstantin Kutzkov. 2016. Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Graphs. In Proceedings of the 33nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016, New York City, NY, USA, June 19-24, 2016 (JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings), Maria-Florina Balcan and Kilian Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Vol. 48. JMLR.org, 2014–2023. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/niepert16.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=SJU4ayYglGoogle Scholar
- Petar Velickovic, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Liò, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph Attention Networks. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 30 - May 3, 2018, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJXMpikCZGoogle Scholar
- Franco Scarselli, Marco Gori, Ah Chung Tsoi, Markus Hagenbuchner, and Gabriele Monfardini. 2009. The Graph Neural Network Model. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 20, 1 (2009), 61–80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yujia Li, Daniel Tarlow, Marc Brockschmidt, and Richard S. Zemel. 2016. Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networks. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedings, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (Eds.). http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05493Google Scholar
- Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merrienboer, Çaglar Gülçehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2014, October 25-29, 2014, Doha, Qatar, A meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL. 1724–1734. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1179Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanjun Dai, Zornitsa Kozareva, Bo Dai, Alexander J. Smola, and Le Song. 2018. Learning Steady-States of Iterative Algorithms over Graphs. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm, Sweden, July 10-15, 2018 (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research), Jennifer G. Dy and Andreas Krause (Eds.), Vol. 80. PMLR, 1114–1122. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/dai18a.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Christopher Morris, Martin Ritzert, Matthias Fey, William L. Hamilton, Jan Eric Lenssen, Gaurav Rattan, and Martin Grohe. 2019. Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-Order Graph Neural Networks. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 27 - February 1, 2019. AAAI Press, 4602–4609. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33014602Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luca Pasa, Nicolò Navarin, and Alessandro Sperduti. 2020. Deep Recurrent Graph Neural Networks. In 28th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning, ESANN 2020, Bruges, Belgium, October 2-4, 2020. 157–162. https://www.esann.org/sites/default/files/proceedings/2020/ES2020-107.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Andrew L Maas, Awni Y Hannun, Andrew Y Ng, et al. 2013. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2013, Atlanta, GA, USA, 16-21 June 2013. 3.Google Scholar
- Alessio Micheli. 2009. Neural Network for Graphs: A Contextual Constructive Approach. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 20, 3 (2009), 498–511. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2008.2010350Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dinh Van Tran, Nicolò Navarin, and Alessandro Sperduti. 2018. On Filter Size in Graph Convolutional Networks. In IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2018, Bangalore, India, November 18-21, 2018. IEEE, 1534–1541. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2018.8628758Google ScholarCross Ref
- Justin Gilmer, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Patrick F. Riley, Oriol Vinyals, and George E. Dahl. 2017. Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6-11 August 2017 (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research), Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh (Eds.), Vol. 70. PMLR, 1263–1272. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/gilmer17a.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Keyulu Xu, Weihua Hu, Jure Leskovec, and Stefanie Jegelka. 2019. How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=ryGs6iA5KmGoogle Scholar
- William L. Hamilton, Zhitao Ying, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, 4-9 December 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, Isabelle Guyon, Ulrike von Luxburg, Samy Bengio, Hanna M. Wallach, Rob Fergus, S. V. N. Vishwanathan, and Roman Garnett (Eds.). 1024–1034. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6703-inductive-representation-learning-on-large-graphsGoogle Scholar
- Zhitao Ying, Dylan Bourgeois, Jiaxuan You, Marinka Zitnik, and Jure Leskovec. 2019. GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Hanna M. Wallach, Hugo Larochelle, Alina Beygelzimer, Florence d’Alché-Buc, Emily B. Fox, and Roman Garnett (Eds.). 9240–9251. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/d80b7040b773199015de6d3b4293c8ff-Abstract.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Wei Jin, Tyler Derr, Yiqi Wang, Yao Ma, Zitao Liu, and Jiliang Tang. 2021. Node Similarity Preserving Graph Convolutional Networks. In 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) 2021, Jerusalem, Israel, March 8-12, 2021. ACM.Google Scholar
- Zhenyu Yang, Ge Zhang, Jia Wu, Jian Yang, Quan Z. Sheng, Hao Peng, Angsheng Li, Shan Xue, and Jianlin Su. 2023. Minimum Entropy Principle Guided Graph Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 114–122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3539597.3570467Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jooyeon Kim, Angus Lamb, Simon Woodhead, Simon Peyton Jones, Cheng Zhang, and Miltiadis Allamanis. 2022. CoRGi: Content-Rich Graph Neural Networks with Attention. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 773–783. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539306Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kai Guo, Kaixiong Zhou, Xia Hu, Yu Li, Yi Chang, and Xin Wang. 2022. Orthogonal Graph Neural Networks. In Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022, Thirty-Fourth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2022, The Twelveth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2022 Virtual Event, February 22 - March 1, 2022. 3996–4004. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/20316Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liang Yang, Cheng Chen, Weixun Li, Bingxin Niu, Junhua Gu, Chuan Wang, Dongxiao He, Yuanfang Guo, and Xiaochun Cao. 2022. Self-Supervised Graph Neural Networks via Diverse and Interactive Message Passing. In Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022, Thirty-Fourth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2022, The Twelveth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2022 Virtual Event, February 22 - March 1, 2022. 4327–4336. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/20353Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wendong Bi, Lun Du, Qiang Fu, Yanlin Wang, Shi Han, and Dongmei Zhang. 2023. MM-GNN: Mix-Moment Graph Neural Network towards Modeling Neighborhood Feature Distribution. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2023, Singapore, 27 February 2023 - 3 March 2023, Tat-Seng Chua, Hady W. Lauw, Luo Si, Evimaria Terzi, and Panayiotis Tsaparas (Eds.). ACM, 132–140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3539597.3570457Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kimiko O. Bowman and L. R. Shenton. 1998. Estimation: Method of Moments. In Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, 2092–2098.Google Scholar
- Srinivas Virinchi and Anoop Saladi. 2023. BLADE: Biased Neighborhood Sampling based Graph Neural Network for Directed Graphs. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2023, Singapore, 27 February 2023 - 3 March 2023. 42–50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3539597.3570430Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zonghan Wu, Shirui Pan, Fengwen Chen, Guodong Long, Chengqi Zhang, and Philip S. Yu. 2021. A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. 32, 1 (2021), 4–24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seyed Mehran Kazemi, Rishab Goel, Kshitij Jain, Ivan Kobyzev, Akshay Sethi, Peter Forsyth, and Pascal Poupart. 2020. Representation Learning for Dynamic Graphs: A Survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21(2020), 70:1–70:73. http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/19-447.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani. 2021. Dynamical algorithms for data mining and machine learning over dynamic graphs. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 11, 2 (2021). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/widm.1393Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. 2014. DeepWalk: online learning of social representations. In The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’14, New York, NY, USA - August 24 - 27, 2014, Sofus A. Macskassy, Claudia Perlich, Jure Leskovec, Wei Wang, and Rayid Ghani (Eds.). ACM, 701–710. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623732Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 13-17, 2016, Balaji Krishnapuram, Mohak Shah, Alexander J. Smola, Charu C. Aggarwal, Dou Shen, and Rajeev Rastogi (Eds.). ACM, 855–864. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939754Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuxiao Dong, Nitesh V. Chawla, and Ananthram Swami. 2017. metapath2vec: Scalable Representation Learning for Heterogeneous Networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Halifax, NS, Canada, August 13 - 17, 2017. ACM, 135–144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098036Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muhan Zhang and Yixin Chen. 2018. Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018, December 3-8, 2018, Montréal, Canada, Samy Bengio, Hanna M. Wallach, Hugo Larochelle, Kristen Grauman, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, and Roman Garnett (Eds.). 5171–5181. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/53f0d7c537d99b3824f0f99d62ea2428-Abstract.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Meng Wang, Fuli Feng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2019, Paris, France, July 21-25, 2019, Benjamin Piwowarski, Max Chevalier, Éric Gaussier, Yoelle Maarek, Jian-Yun Nie, and Falk Scholer (Eds.). ACM, 165–174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331267Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yong-Dong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2020, Virtual Event, China, July 25-30, 2020, Jimmy X. Huang, Yi Chang, Xueqi Cheng, Jaap Kamps, Vanessa Murdock, Ji-Rong Wen, and Yiqun Liu (Eds.). ACM, 639–648. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401063Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shu Wu, Yuyuan Tang, Yanqiao Zhu, Liang Wang, Xing Xie, and Tieniu Tan. 2019. Session-Based Recommendation with Graph Neural Networks. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 27 - February 1, 2019. AAAI Press, 346–353. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301346Google ScholarDigital Library
- Srinivas Virinchi, Anoop Saladi, and Abhirup Mondal. 2022. Recommending Related Products Using Graph Neural Networks in Directed Graphs. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - European Conference, ECML PKDD 2022, Grenoble, France, September 19-23, 2022, Proceedings, Part I (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Massih-Reza Amini, Stéphane Canu, Asja Fischer, Tias Guns, Petra Kralj Novak, and Grigorios Tsoumakas (Eds.), Vol. 13713. Springer, 541–557. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26387-3_33Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu Zheng, Chen Gao, Xiangnan He, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2023. Incorporating Price into Recommendation With Graph Convolutional Networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 35, 2 (2023), 1609–1623. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3091160Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li He, Xianzhi Wang, Dingxian Wang, Haoyuan Zou, Hongzhi Yin, and Guandong Xu. 2023. Simplifying Graph-based Collaborative Filtering for Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2023, Singapore, 27 February 2023 - 3 March 2023, Tat-Seng Chua, Hady W. Lauw, Luo Si, Evimaria Terzi, and Panayiotis Tsaparas (Eds.). ACM, 60–68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3539597.3570451Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shiwen Wu, Fei Sun, Wentao Zhang, Xu Xie, and Bin Cui. 2023. Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 5 (2023), 97:1–97:37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3535101Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adrien Benamira, Benjamin Devillers, Etienne Lesot, Ayush K Ray, Manal Saadi, and Fragkiskos D Malliaros. 2019. Semi-supervised learning and graph neural networks for fake news detection. In 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 568–569.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D. Manning. 2014. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 1532–1543. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1162Google Scholar
- Lawrence Cayton. 2008. Fast Nearinproceedingsest Neighbor Retrieval for Bregman Divergences. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 112–119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1390156.1390171Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ao Li, Zhou Qin, Runshi Liu, Yiqun Yang, and Dong Li. 2019. Spam Review Detection with Graph Convolutional Networks. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2019, Beijing, China, November 3-7, 2019, Wenwu Zhu, Dacheng Tao, Xueqi Cheng, Peng Cui, Elke A. Rundensteiner, David Carmel, Qi He, and Jeffrey Xu Yu (Eds.). ACM, 2703–2711. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3357820Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang Li and Dan Goldwasser. 2019. Encoding Social Information with Graph Convolutional Networks forPolitical Perspective Detection in News Media. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, Anna Korhonen, David R. Traum, and Lluís Màrquez (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2594–2604. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-1247Google ScholarCross Ref
- Na Bai, Fanrong Meng, Xiaobin Rui, and Zhixiao Wang. 2021. Rumour Detection Based on Graph Convolutional Neural Net. IEEE Access 9(2021), 21686–21693. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050563Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chenguang Song, Yiyang Teng, Yangfu Zhu, Siqi Wei, and Bin Wu. 2022. Dynamic graph neural network for fake news detection. Neurocomputing 505(2022), 362–374. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.07.057Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huyen Trang Phan, Ngoc Thanh Nguyen, and Dosam Hwang. 2023. Fake news detection: A survey of graph neural network methods. Applied Soft Computing 139 (2023), 110235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110235Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaoyong Pan and Hong-Bin Shen. 2019. Inferring Disease-Associated MicroRNAs Using Semi-supervised Multi-Label Graph Convolutional Networks. iScience 20(2019), 265–277. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.09.013Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heng Yao, Jihong Guan, and Tianying Liu. 2020. Denoising Protein–Protein interaction network via variational graph auto-encoder for protein complex detection. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 18, 03(2020), 2040010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219720020400107 PMID: 32698725.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xianggen Liu, Yunan Luo, Sen Song, and Jian Peng. 2020. Pre-training of graph neural network for modeling effects of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.12473(2020).Google Scholar
- Manali Singha, Limeng Pu, Abd-El-Monsif Shawky, Konstantin Busch, Hsiao-Chun Wu, J Ramanujam, and Michal Brylinski. 2020. GraphGR: A graph neural network to predict the effect of pharmacotherapy on the cancer cell growth. bioRxiv (2020), 2020–05.Google Scholar
- Zichen Wang, Mu Zhou, and Corey Arnold. 2020. Toward heterogeneous information fusion: bipartite graph convolutional networks for in silico drug repurposing. Bioinformatics 36, Supplement_1 (2020), i525–i533.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hryhorii Chereda, Annalen Bleckmann, Kerstin Menck, Júlia Perera-Bel, Philip Stegmaier, Florian Auer, Frank Kramer, Andreas Leha, and Tim Beißbarth. 2021. Explaining decisions of graph convolutional neural networks: patient-specific molecular subnetworks responsible for metastasis prediction in breast cancer. Genome medicine 13(2021), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Tianyi Zhao, Yang Hu, Linda R Valsdottir, Tianyi Zang, and Jiajie Peng. 2021. Identifying drug–target interactions based on graph convolutional network and deep neural network. Briefings in bioinformatics 22, 2 (2021), 2141–2150.Google Scholar
- Manon Reau, Nicolas Renaud, Li C Xue, and Alexandre M J J Bonvin. 2023. DeepRank-GNN: a graph neural network framework to learn patterns in protein-protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 39, 1 (1 2023). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac759 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article-pdf/39/1/btac759/48448994/btac759.pdfGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Xiao-Meng Zhang, Li Liang, Lin Liu, and Ming-Jing Tang. 2021. Graph neural networks and their current applications in bioinformatics. Frontiers in genetics 12 (2021), 690049.Google Scholar
- Thomas Gaudelet, Ben Day, Arian R Jamasb, Jyothish Soman, Cristian Regep, Gertrude Liu, Jeremy B R Hayter, Richard Vickers, Charles Roberts, Jian Tang, David Roblin, Tom L Blundell, Michael M Bronstein, and Jake P Taylor-King. 2021. Utilizing graph machine learning within drug discovery and development. Briefings in Bioinformatics 22, 6 (05 2021). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab159 bbab159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lingfei Wu, Yu Chen, Kai Shen, Xiaojie Guo, Hanning Gao, Shucheng Li, Jian Pei, and Bo Long. 2023. Graph Neural Networks for Natural Language Processing: A Survey. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning 16, 2(2023), 119–328. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000096Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diego Marcheggiani and Ivan Titov. 2017. Encoding Sentences with Graph Convolutional Networks for Semantic Role Labeling. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 9-11, 2017, Martha Palmer, Rebecca Hwa, and Sebastian Riedel (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1506–1515. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1159Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mingzhou Xu, Liangyou Li, Derek F. Wong, Qun Liu, and Lidia S. Chao. 2021. Document Graph for Neural Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2021, Virtual Event / Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 7-11 November, 2021, Marie-Francine Moens, Xuanjing Huang, Lucia Specia, and Scott Wen-tau Yih (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 8435–8448. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.663Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, Isabelle Guyon, Ulrike von Luxburg, Samy Bengio, Hanna M. Wallach, Rob Fergus, S. V. N. Vishwanathan, and Roman Garnett (Eds.). 5998–6008. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.htmlGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Dan Su, Yan Xu, Wenliang Dai, Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, and Pascale Fung. 2020. Multi-hop Question Generation with Graph Convolutional Network. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, Online Event, 16-20 November 2020 (Findings of ACL), Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (Eds.), Vol. EMNLP 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics, 4636–4647. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.416Google ScholarCross Ref
- Danqing Wang, Pengfei Liu, Yining Zheng, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2020. Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020, Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter, and Joel R. Tetreault (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 6209–6219. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.553Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chenxin An, Ming Zhong, Yiran Chen, Danqing Wang, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2021. Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021, Virtual Event, February 2-9, 2021. AAAI Press, 12498–12506. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/17482Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jingui Huang, Wenya Wu, Jingyi Li, and Shengchun Wang. 2023. Text Summarization Method Based on Gated Attention Graph Neural Network. Sensors 23, 3 (2023). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23031654Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mostafa Haghir Chehreghani. 2022 (to appear),https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-022-00466-8. Half a decade of graph convolutional networks. Nature Machine Intteligence(2022 (to appear),https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-022-00466-8).Google Scholar
- Felix Wu, Amauri H. Souza Jr., Tianyi Zhang, Christopher Fifty, Tao Yu, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. 2019. Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networks. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, 9-15 June 2019, Long Beach, California, USA (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research), Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov (Eds.), Vol. 97. PMLR, 6861–6871. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/wu19e.htmlGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- A Review on the Impact of Data Representation on Model Explainability
Recommendations
How Explainability Contributes to Trust in AI
FAccT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and TransparencyWe provide a philosophical explanation of the relation between artificial intelligence (AI) explainability and trust in AI, providing a case for expressions, such as “explainability fosters trust in AI,” that commonly appear in the literature. This ...
A manifesto on explainability for artificial intelligence in medicine
AbstractThe rapid increase of interest in, and use of, artificial intelligence (AI) in computer applications has raised a parallel concern about its ability (or lack thereof) to provide understandable, or explainable, output to users. This ...
Highlights- AI in Medicine becomes increasingly ubiquitous, with new concerns and questions:
Data representation learning via dictionary learning and self-representation
AbstractDictionary learning is an effective feature learning method, leading to many remarkable results in data representation and classification tasks. However, dictionary learning is performed on the original data representation. In some cases, the ...
Comments