Abstract
With the rapid development of economy and society, decision-makers need a deep understanding of the role of sustainable ecosystem management in practical application, which is crucial to the sustainable development of ecosystems. Understanding the relationship between ecosystem supply and social demand is key in overcoming the contradiction between humans and the ecosystem, as well as achieving successful ecological restoration and healthy regional development. However, there is still a lack of multi-scale and multi-method research on the supply–demand relationship of ecosystem services for key ecological-restoration zone. In this study, a typical ecological barrier (i.e., Ganzhou City of southern China) was selected as the research area, and five ecosystem services (ESs) including water yield (WY), carbon sequestration (CS), crop production (CP), soil retention (SR) and recreation service (RE) were investigated at the pixel, township and county scale in 2020. The balance and coordination analysis of ESs supply and the quantitative analysis of the supply–demand relationship (using the coupling coordination degree (CD), matching degree (MD), and supply–demand ratio (SDR)) were executed under multiple scales. Finally, based on the MD at the township scale, Ganzhou City was divided into four areas: high-demand, low-demand, low-supply and high-supply areas. The results reveal a trade-off relationship between CP and CS at the pixel scale, with no trade-off relationships observed among the ESs at the other scales. The supply–demand relationships of different districts and counties in Ganzhou City are highly uncoordinated, with distinct spatial mismatching. Areas with high CD values are located in Chongyi County and Longnan County, while the low/value SDR area is located in Zhanggong District, with a relatively high population and GDP. The results of MD division based on township level in Ganzhou City show 17 townships are classified as high-demand areas (mainly in urban areas) and 23 townships are classified as low-demand areas (mainly in the suburbs); 77 townships are classified as low-supply areas and 167 townships are classified as high-supply areas, which are mainly distributed in forest areas. This study provides guide for regional ecological space planning, enhances the understanding of ESs management, and provides a more objective reference for decision makers to plan future ecological restoration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agudelo, C. A. R., Bustos, S. L. H., & Moreno, C. A. P. (2020). Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services a critical review. Ecological Modelling, 429, 109103.
Ai, Z., Li, X., Li, J., Yang, Z., Ren, Z., Hou, M., Yao, Y., Cao, X., Li, P., & Dang, X. (2022). Evaluation and classification of landscape functions: A case of Pengyang County on the Loess Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 142, 109221.
Baker, J., Sheate, W. R., Phillips, P., & Eales, R. (2013). Ecosystem services in environmental assessment — Help or hindrance? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 40, 3–13.
Budyko, M. I. (1975). Climate and life. Journal of Range Management, 28, 160.
Chen, H., Yan, W., Li, Z., Wende, W., Xiao, S., Wan, S., & Li, S. (2022). Spatial patterns of associations among ecosystem services across different spatial scales in metropolitan areas: A case study of Shanghai. China. Ecological Indicators, 136, 108682.
Chen, J., Jiang, B., Bai, Y., Xu, X., & Alatalo, J. M. (2019). Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation. Science of the Total Environment, 650(Pt 1), 1426–1439.
Costanza, R., d’arge, R., Groot, R. D., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & Belt, M. V. D. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3–15.
Cui, F., Tang, H., Zhang, Q., Wang, B., & Dai, L. (2019). Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand into optimized management at different scales: A case study in Hulunbuir China. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100984.
Dai, E. F., Wang, X. L., Zhu, J. J., & Xi, W. M. (2017). Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs for plantation forest management to benefit provisioning and regulating services. Ecology and evolution, 7(19), 7807–7821.
Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., & Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21–28.
Estoque, R. C., & Murayama, Y. (2013). Landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes: Implications for environmental sustainability planning for the rapidly urbanizing summer capital of the Philippines. Landscape and Urban Planning, 116, 60–72.
Feng, J., Chen, F., Tang, F., Wang, F., Liang, K., He, L., & Huang, C. (2022). The trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Jiulianshan national nature reserve in Jiangxi Province. China. Forests, 13(3), 416.
Feng, Q., Zhao, W., Fu, B., Ding, J., & Wang, S. (2017). Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Science of the Total Environment, 607–608, 1250–1263.
Feng, Q., Zhao, W., Hu, X., Liu, Y., Daryanto, S., & Cherubini, F. (2020). Trading-off ecosystem services for better ecological restoration: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120469.
Fernandez-Campo, M., Rodríguez-Morales, B., Dramstad, W. E., Fjellstad, W., & Diaz-Varela, E. R. (2017). Ecosystem services mapping for detection of bundles, synergies and trade-offs: Examples from two Norwegian municipalities. Ecosystem Services, 28, 283–297.
Field, C. B., Randerson, J. T., & Malmström, C. M. (1995). Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1), 74–88.
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., Burgess, N. D., Swetnam, R. D., Green, J., Green, R. E., Kajembe, G., Kulindwa, K., Lewis, S. L., Marchant, R., Marshall, A. R., Madoffe, S., Munishi, P. K. T., Morse-Jones, S., Mwakalila, S., Paavola, J., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T., Rouget, M., … Balmford, A. (2011). Measuring, modeling and mapping ecosystem services in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 35(5), 595–611.
Fu, B., Zhang, L., Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Wei, Y., & Skinner, D. (2015). Ecosystem services in changing land use. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15(4), 833–843.
Guan, Q., Hao, J., Ren, G., Li, M., Chen, A., Duan, W., & Chen, H. (2020). Ecological indexes for the analysis of the spatial–temporal characteristics of ecosystem service supply and demand: A case study of the major grain-producing regions in Quzhou. China. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105748.
Guerry, A. D., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G. C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M., Bateman, I. J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T., Feldman, M. W., Folke, C., Hoekstra, J., Kareiva, P. M., Keeler, B. L., Li, S., McKenzie, E., Ouyang, Z., Reyers, B., … Vira, B. (2015). Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 112(24), 7348–7355.
He, G., Lu, Y., Mol, A. P. J., & Beckers, T. (2012). Changes and challenges: China’s environmental management in transition. Environmental Development, 3, 25–38.
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 209–228.
Hou, Y., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., Yang, S., Hu, X., & Cherubini, F. (2020). Relationships of multiple landscape services and their influencing factors on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Landscape Ecology, 36(7), 1987–2005.
Huang, L., Cao, W., Xu, X., Fan, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Linking the benefits of ecosystem services to sustainable spatial planning of ecological conservation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 222, 385–395.
Jackson, R. B., Schenk, H., Jobbagy, E., Canadell, J., Colello, G., Dickinson, R., Field, C., Friedlingstein, P., Heimann, M., & Hibbard, K. (2000). Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models. Ecological applications, 10(2), 470–483.
Larondelle, N., & Lauf, S. (2016). Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales. Ecosystem Services, 22, 18–31.
Li, J., Jiang, H., Bai, Y., Alatalo, J. M., Li, X., Jiang, H., Liu, G., & Xu, J. (2016). Indicators for spatial–temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: A case study of the Taihu River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 60, 1008–1016.
Li, J., Sun, W., Li, M., & Linlin, M. (2021a). Coupling coordination degree of production, living and ecological spaces and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126803.
Li, K., Hou, Y., Andersen, P. S., Xin, R., Rong, Y., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2021b). Identifying the potential areas of afforestation projects using cost-benefit analysis based on ecosystem services and farmland suitability: A case study of the Grain for Green Project in Jinan. China. Science of The Total Environment, 787, 147542.
Li, T., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2019a). Carbon sequestration service flow in the Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China: How it flows, what drives it, and where could be optimized? Ecological Indicators, 96, 548–558.
Li, T., Lü, Y., Fu, B., Hu, W., & Comber, A. J. (2019b). Bundling ecosystem services for detecting their interactions driven by large-scale vegetation restoration: enhanced services while depressed synergies. Ecological Indicators, 99, 332–342.
Liao, Q., Li, T., Wang, Q., & Liu, D. (2023). Exploring the ecosystem services bundles and influencing drivers at different scales in southern Jiangxi China. Ecological Indicators, 148, 110089.
Liu, C., Yang, M., Hou, Y., & Xue, X. (2021). Ecosystem service multifunctionality assessment and coupling coordination analysis with land use and land cover change in China’s coastal zones. Science of the Total Environment, 797, 149033.
Long, X., Lin, H., An, X., Chen, S., Qi, S., & Zhang, M. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of ecosystem service value based on land use/cover change in Dongting Lake wetland. Ecological Indicators, 136, 108619.
Lyu, W., Li, Y., Guan, D., Zhao, H., Zhang, Q., & Liu, Z. (2016). Driving forces of Chinese primary air pollution emissions: an index decomposition analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 136–144.
MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being Synthesis: A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press Washington.
Micheletti, T., Jost, F., & Berger, U. (2016). Partitioning stakeholders for the economic valuation of ecosystem services: Examples of a mangrove system. Natural Resources Research, 25(3), 331–345.
Omotehinse, A. O., De Tomi, G., & Baninla, Y. (2020). Proactive management of ecosystem services in oil sands pre-mining phase. Natural Resources Research, 29, 949–965.
Pedersen, C., & Krøgli, S. O. (2017). The effect of land type diversity and spatial heterogeneity on farmland birds in Norway. Ecological Indicators, 75, 155–163.
Peng, J., Hu, X., Qiu, S., Hu, Y., Meersmans, J., & Liu, Y. (2019). Multifunctional landscapes identification and associated development zoning in mountainous area. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 765–775.
Qing, X., Yutong, Z., & Shenggao, L. (2015). Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk in urban soils of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 120, 377–385.
Qiu, J., & Turner, M. G. (2013). Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110(29), 12149–12154.
Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., Cropper, A., Dasgupta, P., Hassan, R., Leemans, R., & May, R. M. (2006). Nature: The many benefits of ecosystem services. Nature, 443(7113), 749–749.
Shen, J., Li, S., Liang, Z., Liu, L., Li, D., & Wu, S. (2020). Exploring the heterogeneity and nonlinearity of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services bundles in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecosystem Services, 43, 101103.
Shen, J., Li, S., Liu, L., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, H., & Wu, S. (2021). Uncovering the relationships between ecosystem services and social-ecological drivers at different spatial scales in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125193.
Sun, S., Lu, Y., & Fu, B. (2023). Relations between physical and ecosystem service flows of freshwater are critical for water resource security in large dryland river basin. Science of the Total Environment, 857(Pt 3), 159549.
Sun, X., & Li, F. (2017). Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China. Science of the total environment, 609, 1569–1581.
Sun, X., Lu, Z., Li, F., & Crittenden, J. C. (2018). Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 94, 117–129.
Wang, C., Li, W., Sun, M., Wang, Y., & Wang, S. (2021). Exploring the formulation of ecological management policies by quantifying interregional primary ecosystem service flows in Yangtze River Delta region. China. J Environ Manage, 284, 112042.
Wang, H., Wang, L., Fu, X., Yang, Q., Wu, G., Guo, M., Zhang, S., Wu, D., Zhu, Y., & Deng, H. (2022a). Spatial-temporal pattern of ecosystem service supply-demand and coordination in the Ulansuhai Basin. China. Ecological Indicators, 143, 109406.
Wang, J., Lin, Y., Glendinning, A., & Xu, Y. (2018a). Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes. Land Use Policy, 75, 375–387.
Wang, J., Lin, Y., Zhai, T., He, T., Qi, Y., Jin, Z., & Cai, Y. (2018b). The role of human activity in decreasing ecologically sound land use in China. Land Degradation & Development, 29(3), 446–460.
Wang, L.-J., Gong, J.-W., Ma, S., Wu, S., Zhang, X., & Jiang, J. (2022b). Ecosystem service supply–demand and socioecological drivers at different spatial scales in Zhejiang Province. China. Ecological Indicators, 140, 109058.
Williams, J. R., & Arnold, J. G. (1997). A system of erosion-sediment yield models. Soil Technology, 11, 43–55.
Wischmeier, W. H., Smith, D. D., 1965. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: Guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation: Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
Wolde, Z., Wei, W., Likessa, D., Omari, R., & Ketema, H. (2021). Understanding the impact of land use and land cover change on water–energy–food Nexus in the Gidabo Watershed, East African Rift Valley. Natural Resources Research, 30, 2687–2702.
Wu, X., Liu, S., Zhao, S., Hou, X., Xu, J., Dong, S., & Liu, G. (2019). Quantification and driving force analysis of ecosystem services supply, demand and balance in China. Science of The Total Environment, 652, 1375–1386.
Xu, B., & Pan, J. (2022). Simulation and measurement of soil conservation service flow in the Loess Plateau: A case study for the Jinghe River Basin. Northwestern China. Ecological Indicators, 141, 109072.
Yang, M., Zhao, X., Wu, P., Hu, P., & Gao, X. (2022a). Quantification and spatially explicit driving forces of the incoordination between ecosystem service supply and social demand at a regional scale. Ecological Indicators, 137, 108764.
Yang, Z., Zhan, J., Wang, C., & Twumasi-Ankrah, M. J. (2022b). Coupling coordination analysis and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between sustainable development and ecosystem services in Shanxi Province. China. Sci Total Environ, 836, 155625.
Yu, H., Xie, W., Sun, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Identifying the regional disparities of ecosystem services from a supply-demand perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, 105557.
Yuan, Y., Bai, Z., Zhang, J., & Huang, Y. (2023). Investigating the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ecosystem services for regional spatial management. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116591.
Yuan, Y., Chen, D., Wu, S., Mo, L., Tong, G., & Yan, D. (2019). Urban sprawl decreases the value of ecosystem services and intensifies the supply scarcity of ecosystem services in China. Science of the Total Environment, 697, 134170.
Zhang, C., Li, J., Zhou, Z., & Sun, Y. (2021). Application of ecosystem service flows model in water security assessment: A case study in Weihe River Basin. China. Ecological Indicators, 120, 106974.
Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., & Walker, G. R. (2001). Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resources Research, 37(3), 701–708.
Zhang, L., Lü, Y., Fu, B., Dong, Z., Zeng, Y., & Wu, B. (2017). Mapping ecosystem services for China’s ecoregions with a biophysical surrogate approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 161, 22–31.
Zhang, Y., Qi, W., Zhou, C., Ding, M., Liu, L., Gao, J., Bai, W., Wang, Z., & Zheng, D. (2014). Spatial and temporal variability in the net primary production of alpine grassland on the Tibetan Plateau since 1982. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(2), 269–287.
Zhao, J., Xiao, Y., Sun, S., Sang, W., & Axmacher, J. C. (2022a). Does China’s increasing coupling of “urban population” and “urban area” growth indicators reflect a growing social and economic sustainability? Journal of Environmental Management, 301, 113932.
Zhao, Y., Wang, N., Luo, Y., He, H., Wu, L., Wang, H., Wang, Q., & Wu, J. (2022b). Quantification of ecosystem services supply-demand and the impact of demographic change on cultural services in Shenzhen China. Journal of Environmental Management, 304, 114280.
Zhou, L., Zhang, H., Bi, G., Su, K., Wang, L., Chen, H., & Yang, Q. (2022). Multiscale perspective research on the evolution characteristics of the ecosystem services supply-demand relationship in the chongqing section of the three gorges reservoir area. Ecological Indicators, 142, 109227.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42101303), and the Scientific Research Fund of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (No. 205200100503).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
QW: Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—Original draft preparation. TL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. QL: Data curation. DL: Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Li, T., Liao, Q. et al. Multi-scale Analysis of Supply–Demand Relationship of Ecosystem Services and Zoning Management in a Key Ecological-Restoration City (Ganzhou) of China. Nat Resour Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10336-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10336-2