Abstract
This study investigates how adopting causation process during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interactions with three forms social capital. To do so, we use a sample of 1,214 new ventures in the U.S. and offer several contributions to theory and practice. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial approaches, social networks, and innovation, it advances the theoretical understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the study uses a longitudinal approach to offer empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation performance. Third, the findings of this study suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness, ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant effects. Lastly, it offers insights on the complex indirect effects of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures, as they can both diminish and enhance the benefits of the three forms of social capital.
Plain English Summary
How founders’ adoption of entrepreneurial approaches during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. Innovation is critical for the success of new ventures, and entrepreneurs rely on decision-making strategies to create new and innovative products or services. The causal decision-making process, which represents predetermined, planned, and well-defined decision-making, promotes innovativeness in various settings (Sarasvathy, Sarasvathy, Academy of Management Review 26:243–263, 2001; Sarasvathy et al., Organization Studies 29:331–350, 2008, 2010; Dew, Sarasvathy, and Venkataraman, 2004; Alvarez & Barney, 2007). However, an interesting paradox emerges as organic, dynamic, and flexible mechanisms, such as social interactions, can also foster innovativeness (Carnabuci and Diószegi, Academy of Management Journal 58:881–905, 2015). Understanding how causal processes interact with other constructs, such as social capital, to either promote or impede innovative outcomes can guide entrepreneurs as they pursue opportunities. Additionally, it is important to understand the long-term implications of the entrepreneurial processes that founders adopt during the early stages of venture development. Taken together, this study investigates how adopting causal processes during the early stages of venture development can have enduring effects on long-term innovation outcome directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. To test these theoretical arguments, this study uses data from the second Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED II), which surveyed 1,214 U.S. entrepreneurs between 2006 and 2011 about their ventures. This study offers several contributions. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial processes, social processes, and innovation, we advance our understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the longitudinal approach offers empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation outcomes. Third, our findings suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant. Lastly, we offer insights on the complex indirect effect of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.2307/255984
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
Alomani, A., Baptista, R., & Athreye, S. S. (2022). The interplay between human, social and cognitive resources of nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 59(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00539-8
Alsos, G. A., Clausen, T. H., Mauer, R., Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2020). Effectual exchange: From entrepreneurship to the disciplines and beyond. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0030-5
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
Alzamora-Ruiz, J., Fuentes-Fuentes, M. D. M., & Martinez-Fiestas, M. (2021). Effectuation or causation to promote innovation in technology-based SMEs? The effects of strategic decision-making logics. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(7), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1740985
Appelhoff, D., Mauer, R., Collewaert, V., & Brettel, M. (2016). The conflict potential of the entrepreneur’s decision-making style in the entrepreneur-investor relationship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12, 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0357-4
Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(5): 866–878. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.866
Berends, H., Jelinek, M., Reymen, I., & Stultiëns, R. (2014). Product innovation processes in small firms: Combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 616–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12117
Blauth, M., Mauer, R., & Brettel, M. (2014). Fostering creativity in new product development through entrepreneurial decision making. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12094
Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & De Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032032.21192.72
Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 518–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392937
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111684
Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small Business Economics, 10, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007997102930
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
Carnabuci, G., & Diószegi, B. (2015). Social networks, cognitive style, and innovative performance: A contingency perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 881–905. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1042
Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
Chang, H. T., Hsu, H. M., Liou, J. W., & Tsai, C. T. (2013). Psychological contracts and innovative behavior: A moderated path analysis of work engagement and job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(10), 2120–2135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12165
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (S): 95-120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243. Accessed 03-06-2024
Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Cabello-Medina, C., & Carmona-Lavado, A. (2014). Internal and external social capital for radical product innovation: Do they always work well together? British Journal of Management, 25(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12002
da Costa, A. F., & Brettel, M. (2011). Employee effectuation-what makes corporate employees act like entrepreneurs? Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 31(17), 2. http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol31/iss17/2. Accessed 02-06-2024
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). The economic implications of exaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-003-0180-x
Dyer, J., Furr, N., & Lefrandt, C. (2014). The industries plagued by the most uncertainty. Harvard Business Review, 11, 563–584. https://hbr.org/2014/09/the-industries-plagued-by-the-most-uncertainty. Accessed 03-06-2024
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3C1105::AID-SMJ133%3E3.0.CO;2-E
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144
Futterer, F., Schmidt, J., & Heidenreich, S. (2018). Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.008
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780199. Accessed 03-06- 2024
Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1133–1153. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.631
Han, M., & McKelvey, B. (2008). Toward a social capital theory of technology‐based new ventures as complex adaptive systems. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 16(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/18347640810887753
Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.196
Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C. H., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61968124
Ho, M. H. W., Chung, H. F., Kingshott, R., & Chiu, C. C. (2020). Customer engagement, consumption and firm performance in a multi-actor service eco-system: The moderating role of resource integration. Journal of Business Research, 121, 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.008
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Distributed knowledge and transactive processes in groups. In Neale, M.A., Mannix, E.A., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (Eds.) Research on managing groups and teams,15(6), 633–644. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034766. Accessed 03-06-2024
Hormiga, E., Batista‐Canino, R. M., & Sánchez‐Medina, A. (2011). The impact of relational capital on the success of new business start‐ups. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(4), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00339.x
Ibarra H. (1992). Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements towards a network theory of getting things done. In Nohria N.Eccles R. G. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 165–188). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Jisr, R. E., & Maamari, B. E. (2017). Effectuation: Exploring a third dimension to tacit knowledge. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1536
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user's reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL. Scientific Software International.
Jung, H., Vissa, B., & Pich, M. (2017). How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 264–294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0813
Kaartemo, V., Kowalkowski, C., & Edvardsson, B. (2018). Enhancing the understanding of processes and outcomes of innovation: the contribution of effectuation to SD logic. SAGE Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic, 522–535. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328214826. Accessed 03-06-2024
Kannan, G., & Aulbur, W. G. (2004). Intellectual capital: Measurement effectiveness. Journal of intellectual capital, 5(3), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410550363
Kerr, J., & Coviello, N. (2019). Formation and constitution of effectual networks: A systematic review and synthesis. International Journal of Management Review., 21, 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12180
Kianto, A., Sáenz, J., & Aramburu, N. (2017). Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 81, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.018
Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.494827
Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.467
Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2005). Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption. Management Decision, 43(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510581902
Lingelbach, D., Sriram, V., Mersha, T., & Saffu, K. (2015). The innovation process in emerging economies: An effectuation perspective. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.5367/2Fijei.2015.0172
Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519–1533. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0228
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
McKelvie, A., Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., & Johansson, A. (2020). The measurement of effectuation: Highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future. Small Business Economics, 54, 689–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0050-1
Mthanti, T. S., & Urban, B. (2014). Effectuation and entrepreneurial orientation in high-technology firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.850161
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Nguyen, N. M., Killen, C. P., Kock, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2018). The use of effectuation in projects: The influence of business case control, portfolio monitoring intensity and project innovativeness. International Journal of Project Management, 36(8), 1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.08.005
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovativeness? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/256998
Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640
Pisano, G. (2006). Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, 35(8), 1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.008
Pildes, R. H. (1996). The destruction of social capital through law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144(5), 2055–2077. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3312648
Prashantham, S., & Dhanaraj, C. (2010). The dynamic influence of social capital on the international growth of new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 967–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00904.x
Reynolds, P. D. (2000). National panel study of US business startups: Background and methodology. Databases for the Study of Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 153–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7540(00)04006-X
Reynolds, P. D., & Curtin, R. (2007). Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II: Data overview. In 2007 Kauffman Symposium on Entrepreneurship and Innovation Data. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1023086
Reynolds, P. D., Hechavarria, D., Tian, L. R., Samuelsson, M., & Davidsson, P. (2016). Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics: A five cohort outcomes harmonized data set. https://www.academia.edu/31086431/Panel_Study_of_Entrepreneurial_Dynamics_A_Five_Cohort_Outcomes_Harmonized_Data_Set. Accessed 03-06-2024
Roach, D. C., Ryman, J. A., & Makani, J. (2016). Effectuation, innovation and performance in SMEs: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 1460–1060. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2014-0119
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/259121
Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Designing organizations that design environments: Lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies, 29(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0170840607088017
Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity (pp. 77–96). New York: Springer.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource‐constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12091
Smolka, K. M., Verheul, I., Burmeister-Lamp, K., & Heugens, P. P. (2018). Get it together! Synergistic effects of causal and effectual decision-making logics on venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(4), 571–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717744258
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1094428105284955
Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.002
Slotte–Kock, S., & Coviello, N. (2010). Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00311.x
Stewart, D. W. (1981). The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F002224378101800105
Stevenson, W. B., & Radin, R. F. (2009). Social capital and social influence on the board of directors. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 16–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00800.x
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399
Uzzi, B., & Lancaster, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science, 49(4), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.383.14427
Vinarski-Peretz, H., Binyamin, G., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Subjective relational experiences and employee innovative behaviors in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.005
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The mann gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. Handbook of structural equation modeling, 1, 209–231.
Yli‐Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Faridian, P.H., Neubaum, D. & Terjesen, S. Untangling the complexity of innovativeness in new ventures: The interplay between causal entrepreneurial processes and social capital. Small Bus Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00903-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00903-5