OBJECTIVE Despite advances in developing structured risk assessment instruments, there is currently no instrument to assess and manage the risk of intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescents. Given the empirical link between many forms of antisocial behavior, we tested whether structured tools commonly used by professionals to evaluate adolescents' risk of engaging in general violence and offending could be used to identify adolescents at risk for perpetrating intimate partner violence. HYPOTHESES Because researchers have not yet examined whether risk assessment tools for general violence and offending predict intimate partner violence perpetration, we did not have a priori hypotheses regarding the predictive validity of these tools for this purpose. METHOD Research assistants rated 156 adjudicated youth on the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI), and Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV) and recorded charges for intimate partner violence perpetration, any violent reoffending, and any reoffending over a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that total scores and summary risk ratings on the SAVRY and YLS/CMI and total scores on the PCL:YV were significantly predictive of any violent reoffending and any reoffending, with moderate to large effect sizes, but were nonsignificantly associated with intimate partner violence perpetration. Further, penalized logistic regression analysis indicated that the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV did not significantly add incremental validity to age, gender, race/ethnicity, and prior intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization for predicting future intimate partner violence perpetration. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV could have limitations for assessing and managing intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

SAVRY、YLS/CMI 和 PCL:YV 对青少年犯罪者亲密伴侣暴力行为的预测有效性较差。

目标 尽管在开发结构化风险评估工具方面取得了进展，但目前还没有工具可以评估和管理青少年亲密伴侣暴力行为的风险。鉴于多种形式的反社会行为之间存在实证联系，我们测试了专业人士常用的评估青少年参与一般暴力和犯罪风险的结构化工具是否可用于识别有可能实施亲密伴侣暴力的青少年。假设由于研究人员尚未检查一般暴力和犯罪的风险评估工具是否可以预测亲密伴侣的暴力行为，因此我们没有关于这些工具用于此目的的预测有效性的先验假设。方法 研究助理根据青年暴力风险结构化评估 (SAVRY)、青年服务水平/案件管理量表 (YLS/CMI) 和精神病检查表：青年版 (PCL:YV) 对 156 名已裁定的青年进行了评级，并记录了亲密关系的费用伴侣的暴力行为、任何暴力再犯罪以及 2 年随访期内的任何再犯罪。结果 接受者操作特征分析表明，SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 的总分和总结风险评级以及 PCL:YV 的总分可显着预测任何暴力再犯罪和任何再犯罪，具有中等到大的效应大小，但不显着相关与亲密伴侣实施暴力行为。此外，惩罚逻辑回归分析表明，SAVRY、YLS/CMI 和 PCL:YV 并没有显着增加年龄、性别、种族/民族以及之前亲密伴侣暴力实施和受害的增量有效性，以预测未来亲密伴侣暴力实施。结论 这些研究结果表明，SAVRY、YLS/CMI 和 PCL:YV 在评估和管理青少年亲密伴侣暴力行为方面可能存在局限性。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA，保留所有权利）。